A Balanced Review of Strengths and Weaknesses of Learning

go over of eruditeness in the Panic Z wholeness Strategies for Managing Learner Anxiety intromission It is generally agreed that seek can be divided from divergent perspectives, such as being groupinged into empirical and philosophical query according to whether hive away in blueprintation or not ( all(prenominal)ison, 2012). So does cordial seek, which features foc use on tribe in a cordial setting (Robson, 2011, p. 5) and aims at achieving look for purposes of action, change and emancipation (Robson, 2011, p. 39).In terms of search paradigms, social research can be divided into valued research and qualitative research, ordinarily the former foc employ on realizeing numerical information and the latter focusing on collecting data of words (Robson, 2011, p. 5). Thus being aw atomic number 18 of different theoretic approaches, researchers endure reflexive, creative, and capable of reinvention and evolution (Robson, 2011, p. 41). Also according to Robson, the kind o f research refers to utilise research projects which atomic number 18 typically small in scale and downhearted in scope, is termed as trustworthy earth research (Robson, 2011, p. 3).It usually solves problems and issues of direct relevance to peoples lives (Robson, 2011, p. 4). And the research under review, which applies strategies into real programs (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 420), seems to be this kind of research. In this concession, I am going to tax the hold under review from the aspects of strengths and weaknesses, and relate the analysis to the broader issues of research. Strengths Firstly, to close to extent, this clause is formally logical and well-organized by using subheadings and questions like How do trainers deliver learners who undertake challenging tasks? (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 427). Realizing the GAP (Shon, 2012, p. 3) in literature that few assistance has been paid to positive effect of stress in real cases (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 42 0), the researchers organise their research questions, presented their RAT (Shon, 2012, p. 3) and then came the research digit and research method acting, multi-strategy number (Robson, 2011, p. 6) and triangulation (Cohen, 2007, p. 141) respectively. Seen from the perspective of the research objective, it is closely related to previous literature and theory, and tries to exercise research questions by adopting certain research methods.Finally, with the conclusion indicating that the theoretical strategies be in accordance with the comfort-stretch-panic model in previous literature and recommending go on studies (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 435). Secondly, as a social research, it is of great value to have a scientific attitude consistently, sceptically and ethically (Robson, 2011, p. 15). Specifically, by manifestation systematically, I mean this research is well prepared and arranged by two realized trainer and consultant, with over six years experience of providing con sultancy in training (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 38) and more than 30 years experience in education and training (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 420) separately. So they both have a make pass understanding of what, how and why they are doing in the research. They made a expatiate exposition of literature, including theoretical solutions to debilitating learner anxiety (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 421) and practical measures that a trainer can take to prepare learners for challenging tasks (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 427) and objectiveed the questionnaires in research utilizing the strategies in literature.Such a coherent process of research design is sufficient for the first aspect of scientific attitude. And by saying sceptically, I mean the researchers have recognized its limitations of using a small sample of 30 potential participants and the absence of trainees feedback and thence recommended here subsequently work of considering the individual personal oddments and how these impact differential responses to stressful situations (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 435), thus subjecting ideas to practical disconfirmation (Robson, 2011, p. 5). And finally, ethically is represented during the questionnaires, which were sent only to those who indicated availability to benefactor with the research (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 428). The third part of advantages focuses on research method. Combining strategies of analyze and interview, it is obvious that this research in the main conducts qualitative research method. However, it can withal be calledtriangulation because of the close connection among literature, survey and interviews.According to Cohen, triangulation may be delimit as the use of two or more methods of data assemblage in the study of some aspect of human behavior (Cohen, 2007, p. 141). It is ofttimes used to mean bringing different kinds of evidence to bear on a problem (Esterberg, 2002, p. 176). here(predicate) in the article und er review, by saying triangulation, the researchers adopted the approach of triangulating literature, survey and interview. According to different literatures, thither are many images of triangulation and each has its own characteristics, of which theoretical triangulation (Cohen, 2007, p. 42) and methodology triangulation (Cohen, 2007, p. 142) are reflected in this research. According to Cohen, the former draws upon alternative or competing theories in alternative to utilizing atomic number 53 viewpoint only and the other uses either the same method on different occasions, or different methods on the same end of study (Cohen, 2007, p. 142). Sometimes different theories and results from conducting different methods lead to conflict conclusions, it does not mean the research is wrong, it may indicates the necessary of further study and research in wider field.So by adopting different fictional characters of triangulation, researchers feel more confident of their findings and e nhance hardihood (Cohen, 2007, p. 141). Similar with triangulation, there are also variable kinds of rigor. The type I will focus on is concurrent cogency because it is the type enhanced in the article I am evaluating. How does the triangulation ensuring concurrent validity (Cohen, 2007, p. 140) is the main concern of this part. Concurrent validity is a variation of criterion-related validity (Cohen, 2007, p. 40), also called criterion validity by Perri and Bellamy, implying whether the measures are in line of reasoning with other measures of the same content that are generally accepted as valid in the wider research community (Perri 6& Bellamy, 2012, p. 92). To demonstrate this form of validity the data gathered from using one tool moldiness correlate highly with data gathered from using another instrument (Cohen, 2007, p. 140). To be specific, in this article under review, the data is collected both from survey and interview with the guidance of a large amount of literature, a pplying theoretical riangulation and methodology triangulation, thus the concurrent validity is relatively ensured. As Lancy indicates, using multiple data sources also allows one to fill in gaps that would die if we relied on only one source (Lancy, 1993, p. 20). Last but not the least, the research draws on the advantages of its research designs. According to Robson, social research design can be separated into placed design and flexible design (Robson, 2011, p. 5). And the key to distinguish these two designs is whether the procedure and focus of research is fixed or not (Robson, 2011, p. ). However, it should be noticed that there overlaps between them. For example, one specific fixed-designed research could be flexible influenced by qualitative data. So for those using both qualitative and quantitative data, there come multi-strategy designs (Robson, 2011, p. 6). Here by saying multi-strategy, which has substantial collection of both qualitative and quantitative data in diffe rent phases or aspects of the same project (Robson, 2011, p. 6), I do not mean that it contradicts the qualitative research method.It means a research design of combining qualitative and quantitative elements when conducting the qualitative research method. In a narrow sense, the method used in this article should not be called as multi-strategy because the qualitative elements account for a big proportion. However, the researchers take advantages of using both elements. For example, though there is tendency for people to over-choose the middle option (Thomas, 2011, p. 178), the quantitative approach of five-point Likert scale (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 29) does help the researchers from the anaesthetize of getting specific data from the abstract description. And for the analysis, evaluation and interpretation of data and sample, this physical composition uses descriptive statistics (methods used to restate or describe our observations) (Rowntree, 2000, p. 19) to summarize t he sample of research and indicates that future study is needed for inferential statistics, which is pertain with generalizing from a sample, to make estimates and inferences somewhat a wider population (Rowntree, 2000, p. 1). By using opportunistic purposive sampling, the researchers regarded respondents as cases of a diverse group of trainers from across the UK with young-begetting(prenominal) and female trainers aged between 26-55 years (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 428), one might hold the opinion that using mechanical methods (Rowntree, 2000, p. 24) of selecting randomly is a safe way to make a un dark representative sample, however, it is imaginable that you could use random methods and still end up with a biased sample (Rowntree, 2000, p. 25).So considering the rich experience of the researchers, the opportunistic purposive sampling is a better choice to avoid the less representativeness of random sampling. Weaknesses However, there are some reservations. Firstly, when analyzing the effectiveness of different strategies, it seems that the researchers have not thought about figure variable. According to David and Sutton, control variable means a variable that influences the relationship between the independent and dependent variables (David & Sutton, 2011, p. 11). Though it is a term in mathematical notation, I would suggest using it and adopting control groups in each training program. Otherwise the variables such as the difference of trainees, trainers and training environment among different programs might influence the validity of data. by chance this limitation is hard for researchers to avoid because of the fact that the training is not conducted by the researchers themselves. The data are indirectly collected as comments/feedbacks from different trainers.Thus to some extent, it is really hard to make sure the validity of data in this research since there are so many variables. Moreover, even after adopting control groups and comparing data from several groups in one concomitant training program, the validity of data is easily to be influenced by refractory variables. Taking interviews for example, uncontrollable variables could be characteristics of the interviewers, interactions of interviewer/respondent characteristics and privacy concerns of the respondents (Robson, 2011, p. 241).Although the researchers have time-tested to do the best by adopting semi- coordinate interview (Thomas, 2011, p. 164), indicating that 11 respondents were interviewed in a guided unstructured format in which participants were allowed a considerable spirit level of latitude to express their opinions within the interview framework (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 429), they have not excluded the influence of the framework. So it is rather difficult for the researchers to ensure the validity of data and to precisely achieve the research purpose.And another influence about the validity the researchers might not consider well is the represe ntativeness of the sample. Considering that the research mainly focus on questionnaire-based surveys (Internet surveys and interview surveys specifically) (Robson, 2011, p. 240), which ignores the characteristics of non-respondents (Robson, 2011, p. 240), it is doubtable to say that the sample of respondents is representative (Robson, 2011, p. 240).Maybe it is more persuasive to say that our statistical methodology enables us to collect samples that are likely to be as representative as possible (Rowntree, 2000, p. 23) rather than the respondents represented a diverse group of trainers from across the UK with male and female trainers aged between 26-55 years (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 428). Conclusion To sum up, this assignment evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the article under review in the framework of different methodology and methods.Within the article, by comparing the positive aspects and problematic areas, it is relatively persuasive for the authors to yell thei r findings. And the contributions they made by putting the theories into practice are highly comprehended since it is a real world research. References 1. Allison, P. (2012). The source of knowledge pattern origin Vedio. United Kingdom The University of Edinburgh. 2. Cohen, L. , Manion, L. , & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. (6th ed. ). London & New York Routledge. 3.David, M. , & Sutton, C. D. (2011). societal research An Introduction. (2nd ed. ). New Delhi SAGE. 4. Esterberg, K. G. (2002). qualitative methods in social research. United States The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 5. Lancy, D. F. (1993). Qualitative research in education An introduction to the major tradition. New York Longman. 6. Palethorpe, R. , & Wilson, J. P. (2011). Learning in the panic zone Strategies for managing learner anxiety. Journal of European industrial Training, 35(5), 420-438. 7. Perri 6, & Bellamy, C. (2012).Principles of methodology Research design in social science. Croydon SAG E. 8. Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. (3rd ed. ). Cornwall John Wiley&Sons Ltd. 9. Rowntree, D. (2000). Statistics without tears An introduction for non-mathematicians. London Penguin Group. 10. Shon, P. C. H. (2012). How to read journal articles in the social sciences. London SAGE. 11. Thomas, G. (2011). How to do your research project. London SAGE. Self judgment document When you submit your assignment for this course you also need to let in a self assessment document.This is a educatee version of the crown of thorns sheet and must include at least one convict under each of the headings. Do not suggest a arrange for your assignment POSTGRADUATE ASSIGNMENT SELF ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT Course title The sources of knowledge Year 2012 Matriculation number s1262299 1. Knowledge and reasonableness of Concepts Has the school-age child understood the methodological concepts used (or not) by the authors in the document? Yes, I understand the methodological concepts used by the authors in the topic under review by evaluating it from different perspectives in a equilibrise view. . Knowledge and Use of the Literature Has the student shown evidence of reading centerfield and adjunct texts? Yes, I have shown evidence of reading core and supplementary texts by citing their opinion. 3. Critical Reflection on Theory and Practice Has the student explained and critically evaluated the pros and cons of the methodology (theory) and methods (practice) the papers analysed? Yes, I have explained and evaluated the pros and cons of the methodology and methods the paper analysed in a balanced view.And I have tried to enunciate on the basis of what the authors set out to achieve and consider the put they have, thus not being too critical. 4. Constructing Academic Discourse Has the student structured the assignment effectively, adopted an appropriately academic style and eminence? Spelling? Vocabulary? Grammar? Format? Fluency? Yes, I have structured my assignment effectively and adopted an appropriately academic style and tone. I have checked it to make sure of the correctness of the spelling, vocabulary, grammar, format and fluency. All of the above four areas receive equal weighting