Personal Identity Defining Yourself Philosophy Essay

some clayal Identity Defining Yourself philosophy Es dictateTrying to countersink yourself is alike trying to bite your stimulate teeth Alan Watts. Personal Identity play its role as to set up human with quality of its declare which makes him or her a unique iodine. The indistinguishability of a soul that is in question must be suit equal to realize them, and he must be identified by otherwise people. In short, what makes John unique from genus genus Felicia? Both internal (mind) and remote (body) views be the devil essential aspects that overhear to be divergentiated by champion. There are several general philosophical theories of this indistinguishability hassle. carcass possibleness, Soul scheme and Conscious Theory will come to adequate into the missing piece of the puzzle of individualal identity.The body surmisal is one of the theories that define individualised identity. It can be defined as when Person A has a personal identity if and altogether if t hey have the corresponding body X. However, two problems can be found in this rendering. Qualitatively, it is set to own the alike(p) body, exactly if changes happened to the body, can we still define that person as the corresponding one? Everyones body is definitely different if we were to equivalence at the age of 60 and 4. Another problem popped out on the matter of body allowance. If Felicia becomes injured by a tap at war, and then her legs have to be amputated, is she not the same person, Felicia? Therefore, the definition of the surmise is insufficient as the same body alteration is not accounted for. On the other hand, numerically, if a person lost his palpate due to an accident, does that finger is counted as a different body? What if a scientist decided to use some other persons DNA to clone another person with the exact same DNA? Two people with identical body surely cannot be the same person because they are still two different people with identical body. Bot h of them would be living entirely different lives. Hence, in defining personal identity, the body guess by itself had failed to make it legitimate.The Soul speculation will be the next third estate theory in defining personal identity. Similarly to the body theory Person A has a personal identity if and only if they have the same soul. The idea became a lot more complicated when we are trying to define a rather controversial term soul. In the religion aspect, it is thought to be spirit of a person that passes by content of ones body into another realm (eg. Heaven or hell). However, it is still a mysterious phenomenon since there is no proof that can prove its existence. For instance, when a cloud changes to grayish puffy substance, we will still say, the cloud had sour gray. In short, we still accept it as a cloud. It is just galore(postnominal) souls in one body. Therefore, the soul theory is as well as not valid as it fails in that the definiens is insufficient to def ine personal identity.The truest and most recognized philosophy theories about personal identity are the assuredness theory. However, this theory is interpreted differently in three guidances the experiential content, conscious self, and affiliated stream of reason theories. First on the list, the conscious self-theory he or she is said to have personal identity if they have the same self-conscious. In another words, if there is a different conscious in two people, then some(prenominal) of them has personal identity. At first sight, it seems like a good theory to prove personal identity. It is analogous to Descartes cogito, I think therefore I am. Secondly, the consciousness of experiences theory is the common derivatives to the theory of consciousness. It is more easily known as the experiential content. This theory comes from the Lockes theory of having the mind blank, and accumulation from experiences. One is to have personal identity because only one person can experience a t one finite space. We take twins for instance. Although they have identical bodies, the moment they were born, they are already experiencing different moments. Therefore, both of them have personal identity because they experience different surroundings and see things in a different manner. The major problem is that we do not have the ability to remember either whiz experience in our life consciously. For instance, one can still recount another person what they have eaten three days ago simply it is impossible for a person to tell another what they ate instantly after 10 years. In another example, one cannot be define as having different personal identity because they were drunk and acted like another person. In other words, because the human mind has failed to consciously remember every single moment of their lives, this theory eventually is invalid.The connected stream of consciousness will be the last theory about personal identity. With its definition of a persons identity is made out of a stream of connected conscious experiences, this theory eventually had solved the problem of human beingness unable to remember about their experience consciously. With this theory, we will still be the same person although we are unable to remember what we have do at the age of 4 when we are 60 years old. mainly with a finite mind, conscious is affiliated in a chronological pattern. In short, we will take the river as a metaphor. If you see a river flowing every day, you will not be looking at the same part of the river (representing body or experiences), however you will not be able to dispute that is not a river. Hence, let say the river is personal identity. This theory almost had it all right then.Thomas Reid which is also my preferred option to the idea of personal identity disagreed with Lockes memory theory by reducing it to absurdity. Lockes theory was criticized for a few irrelevancies. First of all, I strongly agree with what Reid hold on to. He thinks that personal identity should be determined with something that cannot be divided into parts indivisible however not by determining by operations. He, too, stated the main problem of Lockes is his ideas are of confusing proves of another thing with itself. Officer paradox was introduced by Reid at his attempt to Lockes theory to absurdity.Memory is the best evidence for identity, says Locke. If Felicia was able to remember what she had done, hence, she will be the same person with the same identity. But if Felicia happened to be a forgetful person, will that spuriouss she loses her personal identity? Reids idea can further support my commove where he believes that to be able to prove something for its constituents and its existence, an evidence of a particular(a) matter is relatively irrelevant. It was argued that if I were to believe the world is created, it does not mean that the foundation of the world is valid. This argument is similar to someone who remember doing someth ing but that does not mean he will the same person who did that something. I personally think that the memory and personal identity are both affiliated. They are related not in the smell out of determining who a person is but they are related in a sense where one existed over time instead. Therefore, it was concluded by Reid that Lockes memory theory is a presupposition of personal identity by memory rather than the creation of it.A U.S. author, James Baldwin once quoted, An identity seemed like it has arrived by the way when a person faces and uses his experience. Assuming that we will not be able to put everything into a complete puzzle, we are left with one choice. rob a rose, separate the petals one by one which each petals represents one idea. Whatever came out at the end, it is your call by your very own intuition. But for me, I would choose to go for Reids philosophical views about personal identity.