Torture ever an acceptable method of obtaining information

Is distorted shape ever an acceptable method of obtaining information ? BY Kvrm 234 Is rag ever an acceptable method of obtaining information? For most of us, our bowel Instinct Is to say no and studies have shown that Information obtained by the use of torture is unreliable. However, imagine a hypothetical situation w present a terrorist group has pose a bomb and the government caught one of its members.This captured terrorist testament only suit to planting a bomb In a high concern area. Would that convince you to use torture? Or what if a terrorist captured your family and took them to a secret location. Like the bomb scenario, the authorities have managed to capture one of the terrorists and he wont give up the location. Would you have any qualms about apply torture to extract the information, even if that information might be haywire?Heres a news story clip about the effectiveness (or In this case the Ineffectiveness) of torture Its become the conventional wisdom that the tortured will say anything to make the torture stop, and that anything need not be aboveboard as long as it is what the torturers want to hear. But years worth of studies In neuroscience, as well as new research, suggest that here are, in addition, fundamental aspects of neurochemistry that increase the chance that information obtained under torture will not be truthful. The backstory.The Inspector general of the CIA last month released a 2004 report on the interrogation of A1 Qaeda suspects. As my workfellow Mark Hosenball reported, it and other internal documents (which Cheney called on the CIA to release, believing they would back his claim) do not show that torture worked. In fact, The New York Times reported, the documents do not refer to any specific interrogation methods and do not assess their effectiveness. Scientists do not pretend to know, in any psyche case, whether torture might extract useful Information.But as neurobiologist Shane OMara of the Trinity Colleg e wreak of Neuroscience in Dublin explains in a paper in the journal Trends in Cognitive Science called Torturing the Brain, the use of such techniques appears motivated by a folk psychology that Is demonstrably incorrect. Solid scientific evidence on how repeated and extreme stress and pain move memory and executive functions (such as planning or forming intentions) suggests these techniques are marvellous to do anything other than the opposite of that ntended by coercive or enhanced interrogation. As you can see, torture is unreliable.